← Search

Christine Ohrberg

Olive Branch, MS
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
67 matches · 29W–38L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Christine Ohrberg to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history67 matches
L
2026-09-03 · Green-NC-Southaven · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Candace Dunlap
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-25 · Bowling 40+ NC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Terra Bowling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-20 · Bowling 40+ NC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Yongqin Zhang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-28 · Touchstone - NC -Southaven · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Terra Bowling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-07-16 · Touchstone - NC -Southaven · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Neda Nazemi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-01 · Herren - NC - Southaven · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Paul Ohrberg mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-06-23 · Touchstone - NC -Southaven · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Neda Nazemi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-03 · Herren - NC - Southaven · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Paul Ohrberg mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-05-07 · Thompson/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melanie Schrank
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-05 · Thompson/Memphis · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Wilkes Yonchak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-26 · Bowling - NC - Southaven · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with MacKenzie Fowler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-19 · Bowling - NC - Southaven · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jami Feinberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 46.2% of games
3.0
31%
9W–20L · 45.9% of games
3.5
0%
0W–5L · 32.6% of games
5.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 48.8% of games
6.5
63.6%
7W–4L · 51.2% of games
3.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 51.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
25 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
14 matches
#2 Singles
6%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
2 matches
#3 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams