← Search

Landon Davis

— year-end
67 matches · 37W–30L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Landon Davis to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history67 matches
L
2026-08-30 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Pablo Sanchez Soria
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-18 · Adams/Wittenberg/LR/PVCC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with James Ramsay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-04 · Adams/Wittenberg/LR/PVCC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with MacKenzie Barnes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-04 · Shaver/Pinter/LR/Rebs · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Adam Raines
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-04-28 · Pinter/Shaver/LR/REBS · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Derrick Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-04-26 · Shaver/Pinter/LR/Rebs · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Slaughter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-04-25 · Shaver/Pinter/LR/Rebs · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joe Shaver
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-15 · Szeto/LR/Rebs · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Derrick Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-08 · Shaver/Pinter/LR/Rebs · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chase Guthrie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-04-02 · Pinter/Shaver/LR/REBS · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joe Shaver
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-03-09 · Pinter/Shaver/LR/REBS · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Derrick Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-01 · Pinter/Shaver/LR/REBS · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Derrick Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
Teams33 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
65.4%
17W–9L · 57.4% of games
4.0
45%
9W–11L · 49.4% of games
4.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
80%
8W–2L · 58.7% of games
3.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 56.6% of games
4.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
18 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe