← Search

Anna Padgett Seigel

Tulsa, OK
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
16 matches · 9W–7L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Anna Padgett Seigel to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history16 matches
L
2026-08-06 · Tjeerdsma/LF 3.5 tri W · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Lauren Gellman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-22 · Tjeerdsma/LF 3.5 tri W · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Laura Barnes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-11 · Barnes/TU/3.0W · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Martha Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-11 · Barnes/TU/3.0W · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Martha Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-04-21 · Barnes/TU/3.0W · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katie Hughes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-04-13 · Barnes/TU/3.0W · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Martha Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-03-30 · Barnes/TU/3.0W · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Martha Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2025-11-05 · Hill/TU/DAY3.0 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maggie Yar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-11-03 · Hill/TU/DAY3.0 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Martha Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2025-09-29 · Hill/TU/DAY3.0 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maggie Yar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2025-09-15 · Hill/TU/DAY3.0 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Martha Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2025-06-24 · Freudenrich/TTC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Allison Jacobs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2025–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
2.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0
64.3%
9W–5L · 56.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
5 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
3 matches
#2 Singles
13%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova