← Search

Julie Harrelson

— year-end
133 matches · 62W–71L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Julie Harrelson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history133 matches
L
2026-09-02 · Acebo/LF/40&over3.5W · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cheryl Sumners
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-30 · Schmidt/LF/mixed tri 8.0 · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Steven Anagnost mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-08-06 · Harrelson/LF/tri 3.5W · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Cheryl Sumners
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-02 · Schmidt/LF/mixed tri 8.0 · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Steven Anagnost mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-22 · Harrelson/LF/tri 3.5W · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Cheryl Sumners
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-05-09 · Wasserott/LF 55s 7.0W · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sherri Dotson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-05-02 · Wasserott/LF 55s 7.0W · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sherri Dotson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-04-23 · Wasserott/LF 55s 7.0W · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Boutin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-28 · Wasserott/LF 55s 7.0W · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Katy Plaisance
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
L
2026-03-07 · Wasserott/LF 55s 7.0W · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cheryl Sumners
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-10-15 · Acebo/LF/3.5W · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Blackshare
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2025-10-08 · Acebo/LF/3.5W · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Blackshare
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
Teams33 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 50.4% of games
3.5
55.1%
38W–31L · 49.7% of games
4.0
33.3%
5W–10L · 41.1% of games
7.0
42.9%
12W–16L · 47.1% of games
5.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
14.3%
1W–6L · 30.8% of games
7.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 40.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
56 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
43 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
29 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams