← Search

Curt Schwab

Davidsonville, MD
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
23 matches · 9W–14L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Curt Schwab to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history23 matches
L
2026-09-03 · Farooq · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bryant Centofanti
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-30 · Farooq · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bryant Centofanti
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-02 · Farooq · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with William Bell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-14 · Elcock/Toro · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Seth Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-07 · Elcock/Toro · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-17 · Elcock/Toro · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-16 · Jacobs · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Aleksey Pletnev
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-05-10 · Jacobs · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alexander Sherwin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-25 · Jacobs · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Aleksey Pletnev
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
W
2026-04-18 · Jacobs · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-04-12 · Jacobs · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Aleksey Pletnev
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-04 · Jacobs · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alexander Sherwin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
14.3%
2W–12L · 34.9% of games
5.5
50%
2W–2L · 41.7% of games
2.5mixed
100%
5W–0L · 66.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 30% of the time
#2 Doubles
30%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
6 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
5 matches
#1 Singles
17%
4 matches
#2 Singles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer