← Search

Aimee Rzepka

Detroit, MI
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
42 matches · 27W–15L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Aimee Rzepka to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history42 matches
L
Michael Scott / Sharyn Cousins
2026-08-05 · EAST-MOORE 5.5 COMBO MIX · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Prabhjit Mutneja mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-08-04 · EAST-Crites 18s 6.0X F · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sean Kenyon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-07-25 · EAST-Zampardo 18s 7.0X F · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patrick Serda mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-17 · EAST-Crites 18s 6.0X F · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sean Kenyon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-12 · EAST-Zampardo 18s 3.5 NW F4 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cheryl Cusmano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-30 · EAST-Bates 40s 3.0 NW F2 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michele Burton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-06-25 · EAST-Bates 18s 3.0 NW F5 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Peggy Offerle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
L
2026-06-10 · EAST-Zampardo 18s 3.5 NW F4 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Peggy Offerle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-09 · EAST-Bates 40s 3.0 NW F2 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Peggy Offerle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-05 · EAST-Zampardo 18s 7.0X F · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Blaine Borchardt mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-06-04 · EAST-Bates 18s 3.0 NW F5 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Peggy Offerle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-06-03 · EAST-Zampardo 18s 3.5 NW F4 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Peggy Offerle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
100%
4W–0L · 76.2% of games
3.0
70%
7W–3L · 60.4% of games
3.5
25%
1W–3L · 36.6% of games
5.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
5.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
5.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 45.3% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
12 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
8 matches
#1 Singles
7%
3 matches
#2 Singles
5%
2 matches
#3 Singles
5%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal