← Search

Susan Danowski-Miller

Elizabethtown, PA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
336 matches · 181W–155L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Susan Danowski-Miller to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history336 matches
L
2026-08-06 · RCW - Nolt · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jessica May
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-07-29 · RCW - Nolt · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jessica May
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-07-07 · Hempfield Hangen 18 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-26 · RCW - Nolt · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Debra Siefken
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-06-25 · Hempfield - Brooks · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kelly Trach
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-23 · Hempfield - Hangen 55 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Andrea Holder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-18 · Hempfield - Hangen 55 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Carol Dimm
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-06-17 · Hempfield - Brooks · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kelly Trach
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-06-16 · Hempfield Brunch Babes - Schlager · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with JoAnne Hangen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-10 · Hempfield - Brooks · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kelly Trach
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-06-09 · Hempfield Hangen 18 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-06-09 · RCW - Nolt · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bonnie Nolt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams69 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
44.6%
25W–31L · 50.7% of games
4.0
42.3%
11W–15L · 48.1% of games
4.5
75%
3W–1L · 65.5% of games
7.0
66%
68W–35L · 55.6% of games
7.5
75%
3W–1L · 71.9% of games
8.0
37.1%
26W–44L · 43.5% of games
7.0mixed
61.5%
16W–10L · 53.4% of games
8.0mixed
69.2%
18W–8L · 55.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
141 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
122 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
71 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe