JoAnne Hangen
Lancaster, PA
443 matches · 162W–281L · seasons 2019–2026
Captains: add JoAnne Hangen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history443 matches
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 0-1
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
N/A
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams94 teams · 2020–2027
Hempfield - HangNimm
Hempfield - Hangen40Mx
Hempfield SWINGERS (Banh)
Hempfield - Baumer 7.0
Hempfield - Brooks
Hempfield - Campbell Tait
Hempfield - HangNimm
Hempfield - Hangen 3.5
Hempfield - Hangen 40mx
Hempfield - Hangen 55
Hempfield - Hangen7
Hempfield - Weik / Nolt
Hempfield Brunch Babes - Schlager
Hempfield Hangen 18
Hempfield Hangen Tri
Hempfield Swingers (Schlager)
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
40.5%
32W–47L · 48.7% of games
4.0
35.2%
19W–35L · 44% of games
7.0
40.2%
33W–49L · 47.2% of games
7.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0
16.2%
13W–67L · 35.3% of games
6.0mixed
25%
2W–6L · 47.5% of games
7.0mixed
47.4%
45W–50L · 49.2% of games
8.0mixed
40.6%
13W–19L · 49.2% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
165 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
163 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
115 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.