← Search

Michael Blackburn

North Chesterfield, VA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
347 matches · 172W–175L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Michael Blackburn to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history347 matches
L
2026-09-12 · ACAC Delisio Destruction Crew 7.5 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Eddie Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-14 · ACAC Big Nasty - Pfeiffer · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Nedeff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-08-13 · ACAC Volley Llamas - Jones · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pamela Blackburn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-02 · ACAC Delisio Destruction Crew 7.5 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Eddie Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-07-30 · ACAC Big Nasty - Pfeiffer · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cliff Heller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-29 · ACAC Big Nasty - Pfeiffer · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with William Crowe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-26 · ACAC Volley Llamas - Jones · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pamela Blackburn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-24 · ACAC-Babik · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with William Price
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
W
2026-07-19 · ACAC-Babik · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matt Curtis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-07-09 · ACAC Volley Llamas - Jones · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pamela Blackburn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-07-07 · ACAC Big Nasty - Pfeiffer · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jonathan Brew
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-27 · ACAC-Babik · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with William Price
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams64 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
4.0
55%
83W–68L · 50.7% of games
4.5
22.2%
4W–14L · 37.5% of games
7.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
32.1%
9W–19L · 47.5% of games
8.0
63.8%
37W–21L · 53.4% of games
8.5
26.1%
6W–17L · 38.7% of games
9.0
25%
3W–9L · 44.2% of games
6.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
25%
2W–6L · 42.4% of games
7.5mixed
66.7%
6W–3L · 58.1% of games
8.0mixed
50%
6W–6L · 47.7% of games
8.5mixed
50%
4W–4L · 49.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
132 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
127 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
85 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King