← Search

Jonathan Brew

— year-end
50 matches · 26W–24L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Jonathan Brew to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history50 matches
L
2026-08-14 · ACAC Big Nasty - Pfeiffer · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cliff Heller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-29 · ACAC Big Nasty - Pfeiffer · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Nedeff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-26 · ACAC-Babik · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Almedin Muminovic
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-07-15 · ACAC-Babik · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Richard Sherman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-07-07 · ACAC Big Nasty - Pfeiffer · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Blackburn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
James Dugger / Michael Anderson
2026-06-15 · ACAC Singh 65 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Richard Sherman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-0
L
2026-06-14 · ACAC-Babik · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Blackburn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-08 · ACAC Singh 65 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Karl Koenig
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-26 · ACAC Singh 65 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Richard Sherman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-18 · ACAC Singh 65 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Anant Singh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-27 · ACAC Singh 65 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Craik Goodspeed
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-13 · ACAC Singh 65 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Richard Sherman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
Teams26 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
85.7%
12W–2L · 55% of games
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
56.2%
9W–7L · 50.2% of games
8.5
16.7%
1W–5L · 44% of games
9.0
25%
1W–3L · 37.7% of games
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 52% of the time
#2 Doubles
52%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
12 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
11 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams