← Search

Cheryl Vaught

Kansas City, MO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
100 matches · 29W–71L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Cheryl Vaught to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history100 matches
W
2026-06-14 · HOA/Asbell/55&over7.0W · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with MaryAnn Luchtel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-05-22 · Luchtel, MaryAnn · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Warshawsky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-05-20 · Shapland, Suzanne · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tina Kempf
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-05-17 · HOA/Asbell/55&over7.0W · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Andrea Root
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-05-09 · HOA/Asbell/55&over7.0W · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Andrea Root
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-05-01 · Luchtel, MaryAnn · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sonia Crim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
Laura Thompson / Patty Morton
2026-04-25 · HOA/Asbell/55&over7.0W · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alice Edwards
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-12 · HOA/Asbell/55&over7.0W · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Andrea Root
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-2, 0-1
L
2026-03-29 · Jensen, Jacqui · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nina Leek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-08 · Jensen, Jacqui · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrea Root
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
L
2026-03-06 · Murphy, Susan · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kyle Nagy mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-27 · Murphy, Susan · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with bob reid mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
39.1%
9W–14L · 48.9% of games
4.0
8.3%
2W–22L · 30.1% of games
4.5
12.5%
1W–7L · 32.4% of games
7.0
35%
7W–13L · 47.8% of games
8.0
60%
3W–2L · 47.4% of games
9.0
40%
2W–3L · 48.4% of games
7.0mixed
33.3%
3W–6L · 40.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 46% of the time
#3 Doubles
46%
46 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
33 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
21 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer