← Search

Laura Grush

Littleton, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
143 matches · 69W–74L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Laura Grush to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history143 matches
W
2026-07-22 · KC-RH YELLOW · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Conroy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-07-21 · KC-RH GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heidi Griffiths
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-16 · KC-CC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dawn Robbins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-15 · KC-RH YELLOW · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Laurie Lopez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-14 · KC-RH GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sharon Seemann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-07-09 · KC-CC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dawn Robbins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-07-08 · KC-RH YELLOW · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Laurie Lopez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-07-07 · KC-RH GREEN · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-02 · KC-CC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heidi Griffiths
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-06-30 · KC-RH GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jami Jensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-25 · KC-CC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dawn Robbins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-24 · KC-RH YELLOW · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Beth Beers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
55.4%
31W–25L · 50.1% of games
4.0
39.1%
25W–39L · 44.4% of games
7.0
70%
7W–3L · 55.1% of games
8.0
50%
4W–4L · 52.3% of games
7.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
55 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
48 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
26 matches
#1 Singles
6%
9 matches
#2 Singles
4%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert