← Search

Dee Woodcock

Fort Collins, CO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
81 matches · 34W–47L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Dee Woodcock to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history81 matches
L
2026-05-11 · MLF RED · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-27 · MLF RED · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-04-20 · MLF RED · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sybil Sharvelle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
2025-08-07 · CSU GREEN · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2025-07-24 · CSU GREEN · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Linda Abercrombie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2025-07-07 · LVTA RED · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sybil Sharvelle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-06-26 · CSU GREEN · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2025-06-23 · LVTA RED · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2025-06-16 · LVTA RED · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2025-06-02 · LVTA RED · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joan Parker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2025-05-30 · CSU GREEN · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Valerie Hecker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2025-05-23 · CSU GREEN · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Wendy Clark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
50.9%
29W–28L · 49% of games
8.0
18.2%
4W–18L · 37.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 35% of the time
#3 Doubles
35%
28 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
22 matches
#2 Singles
15%
12 matches
#1 Singles
14%
11 matches
#1 Doubles
10%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer