← Search

Ann Phillips

SALT LAKE CITY, UT
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
140 matches · 78W–62L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Ann Phillips to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history140 matches
L
2026-08-06 · Double Trouble · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Marianne Squires
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-01 · Double Trouble · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jane McQuade
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-29 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Terry Miya
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-27 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Debbie Hutton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-06-17 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jane McQuade
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-10 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Marianne Squires
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-06-03 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Massae Sato MacIunas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-06-01 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Terry Miya
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-14 · Liberty Park-Woodbury/Miller · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jane McQuade
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-23 · Liberty Park-Woodbury/Miller · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jane McQuade
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2025-07-10 · Liberty Park-Woodbury/Miller · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Cathy Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 0-6, 1-0
L
2025-07-09 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Massae Sato MacIunas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 54.6% of games
4.5
53.8%
43W–37L · 51.7% of games
8.0
60%
9W–6L · 52.6% of games
9.0
54.8%
17W–14L · 53.2% of games
8.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 42.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
50 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
49 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
41 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer