← Search

Emily Wallace

Fruit Heights, UT
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
191 matches · 93W–98L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Emily Wallace to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history191 matches
W
2026-08-06 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lora Cobabe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-07-27 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Molly Richards
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-23 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lora Cobabe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-07-02 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Molly Richards
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-29 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kathy Miller-Rees
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-18 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lora Cobabe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
W
2026-05-21 · Liberty Park-Wallace/Kemp · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lora Cobabe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-05-14 · Liberty Park-Wallace/Kemp · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lora Cobabe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-02 · Liberty Park-Wallace/Kemp · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Nanette Heath
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-04-30 · Liberty Park-Wallace/Kemp · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lora Cobabe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-04-27 · Liberty Park-Wallace/Kemp · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lora Cobabe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-04-22 · Liberty Park-Wallace/Kemp · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Taylor Cordovil
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams61 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
80%
4W–1L · 67.4% of games
3.5
70.6%
12W–5L · 64.2% of games
4.0
65.8%
25W–13L · 55.9% of games
4.5
40.3%
50W–74L · 47.9% of games
8.5mixed
20%
1W–4L · 40.8% of games
9.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
91 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
61 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
28 matches
#1 Singles
5%
9 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe