← Search

Lori Loeb

— year-end
106 matches · 54W–52L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Lori Loeb to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history106 matches
L
2026-08-26 · MLF ORANGE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lara Abrahamson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-08-11 · CSU GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Novacek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-05 · LT BLUE · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Debora J Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
Teresa Nornes / Michelle Clark
2026-08-05 · MLF ORANGE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Layne Martin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-08-01 · #2 Doubles · with Tracey Stefanon championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-10 · #2 Doubles · with Laura Powers championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-10 · #2 Doubles · with Lara Abrahamson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-07-08 · LT BLUE · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Debora J Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-07 · CSU GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Trevino
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-0, 0-1
L
2026-07-02 · MLF MAROON · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Samantha Gallegos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-01 · LT BLUE · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Debora J Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-06-23 · CSU GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erin Dirvonas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
Teams29 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
63.3%
31W–18L · 58.5% of games
4.0
18.2%
2W–9L · 40.7% of games
7.0
66.7%
12W–6L · 59.3% of games
8.0
18.2%
2W–9L · 40.4% of games
7.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 65.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 43% of the time
#2 Doubles
43%
46 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
35 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
23 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert