← Search

Jatin Rajput

New York, NY
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
120 matches · 58W–62L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jatin Rajput to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history120 matches
L
2026-08-14 · #2 Doubles · with Rajat Bhatia championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-14 · #2 Doubles · with Edward Forward championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-25 · #2 Doubles · with Rajat Bhatia championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-07-25 · #2 Doubles · with Rajat Bhatia championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-08 · #1 Doubles · with Horatio Wildman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-06-17 · Metro: Rader/Bhagwagar · #2 Singles · 0.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-15 · Rader/Bhagwagar · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eric Laderman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-06-08 · Rader/Bhagwagar · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ben Lloyd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-06-04 · Metro: Rader/Bhagwagar · #2 Singles · 0.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-1
W
2026-06-02 · #2 Doubles · with Peter Laurelli championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-05-17 · Metro: Rader/Bhagwagar · #1 Singles · 0.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-12 · Rader/Bhagwagar · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Horatio Wildman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
0.0
76.9%
10W–3L · 62.8% of games
4.0
58%
40W–29L · 52.7% of games
4.5
13%
3W–20L · 37.5% of games
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 43.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
56 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
32 matches
#1 Singles
13%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
8%
9 matches
#2 Singles
6%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal