← Search

Jamie Tallman

Lincoln, NE
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
53 matches · 28W–25L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Jamie Tallman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history53 matches
L
2026-08-25 · Lefler Stempson · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rick Stempson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-08 · Freeman · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Seth Kingery
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-07-01 · Freeman · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Justin Brinkman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-24 · Freeman · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Christopher Freeman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-17 · Freeman · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Peter Blankenship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-03 · Freeman · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Joseph Bucknell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-05-13 · Freeman · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Seth Kingery
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
W
2026-05-06 · Freeman · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Seth Kingery
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2025-09-17 · LI/Timan/Mid-TriM · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Caleb Nielsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-0
W
2025-08-26 · LI/Timan/Mid-TriM · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rick Stempson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
L
2025-08-12 · LI/Timan/Mid-TriM · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rick Stempson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2025-07-29 · Sedeucers · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Bethany Clark mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
40%
2W–3L · 44.9% of games
3.5
44.4%
4W–5L · 50% of games
4.0
76.2%
16W–5L · 61.9% of games
4.5
31.2%
5W–11L · 44.3% of games
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
26 matches
#1 Singles
21%
11 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
6 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal