← Search

Adeeb Adam

Omaha, NE
4.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
19 matches · 13W–6L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Adeeb Adam to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history19 matches
W
2026-06-24 · Betts · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Fletcher Kuper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-06-17 · Betts · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Fletcher Kuper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-05-20 · Betts · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Fletcher Kuper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-05-13 · Betts · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Fletcher Kuper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-6, 1-0
L
2025-06-20 · NE/Hunt-Spisak/18&Over/8.0X · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brandi Goldapp mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L
2025-06-09 · Lowe · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Grayson Arnold
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-05-16 · NE/Hunt-Spisak/18&Over/8.0X · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Samantha Wahl mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-7
L
2024-09-15 · Hansen · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gabriel Pariacote
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W
2024-08-25 · Hansen · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joe Engel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2024-08-18 · Hansen · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joe Engel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2024-08-02 · Stuva · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jolene Johnson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
W
2024-06-27 · Willms · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Douglas Stuva
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.5
80%
4W–1L · 54.5% of games
8.0mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 58.4% of games
9.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 42% of the time
#2 Doubles
42%
8 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer