← Search

Brenda Monajjem

Shelbyville, TN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
92 matches · 46W–46L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Brenda Monajjem to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history92 matches
L
2026-08-26 · LaRoy/Lee/Nasvhille · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Autumn Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-08-25 · Blankenship/Murfreesboro · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sonja Plumlee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-19 · Blankenship/Murfreesboro · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Marian Vangeli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-08-13 · Kelley/Murfreesboro · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carly Phillips
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-08-12 · LaRoy/Lee/Nasvhille · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cindy Chaffin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-10 · Blankenship/Murfreesboro · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tammy Shrivalle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-30 · Kelley/Murfreesboro · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelly Horna
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-23 · Kelley/Murfreesboro · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sara Bryson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-07-21 · Wishing/Murfreesboro · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carl Ragland mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-07-20 · Eubank/Murfreesboro · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cassie Bourdon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-19 · Wishing/Murfreesboro · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carl Ragland mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-0
L
Jennifer Kelley / Collier Andress Smith
2026-06-22 · Eubank/Murfreesboro · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cassie Bourdon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams58 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
75%
3W–1L · 67.1% of games
4.0
46.3%
25W–29L · 48% of games
7.5
55.6%
15W–12L · 52.9% of games
4.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 60.2% of games
4.5mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
31 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
27 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe