← Search

Lois Dosky

— year-end
226 matches · 156W–70L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Lois Dosky to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history226 matches
W
2026-08-07 · Olympic 1 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lori Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
Kelley LaPlace / Rebecca Long
2026-07-22 · Olympic 1 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Janet Disbennett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-2, 1-0
W
Rebecca Long / Kathy Ratterman
2026-07-10 · Olympic 1 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lori Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
Rebecca Long / Kelley LaPlace
2026-06-26 · Olympic 1 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lori Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-05-08 · Olympic · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Linda Guyton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-01 · Olympic · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ann Leithauser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-04-29 · Olympic · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ann Leithauser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-04-24 · Olympic · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ann Leithauser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-04-23 · Olympic · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Anne Hunnell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-04-10 · Olympic · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Allison Moneme
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
Angela Flanigan / Sarah Cole
2026-03-25 · Olympic · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Anne Hunnell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-20 · Olympic · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Allison Moneme
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
Teams40 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
76.1%
67W–21L · 59.7% of games
4.5
54.2%
13W–11L · 55.6% of games
7.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
50%
8W–8L · 50% of games
8.0
75.3%
64W–21L · 58% of games
8.5
27.3%
3W–8L · 43.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 60% of the time
#1 Doubles
60%
136 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
58 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
32 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe