← Search

Angela Flanigan

Columbus, OH
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
413 matches · 291W–122L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Angela Flanigan to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history413 matches
L
2026-09-11 · Racquet Club 1 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelli Elsea
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
W
2026-08-06 · Racquet Club · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jessica Nimjee
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-25 · Racquet Club · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sylvie Lederer
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-06-22 · Racquet Club · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mary Homoelle
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-08 · Racquet Club 1 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amanda Guzzo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-05-03 · Racquet Club 1 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelli Elsea
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-01 · Racquet Club 1 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelli Elsea
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
Sarah Logan / Michelle Robinson
2026-04-26 · Racquet Club 1 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelli Elsea
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-04-23 · Racquet Club · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Pat Rothney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-04-20 · Racquet Club 1 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Denisa Hiles
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-04-17 · Racquet Club 1 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelli Elsea
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-5
L
2026-04-15 · Racquet Club · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Pat Rothney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams58 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
71.7%
213W–84L · 57.8% of games
4.5
0%
0W–8L · 32.9% of games
7.5
79.1%
68W–18L · 61.3% of games
8.0
14.3%
1W–6L · 40% of games
8.5
61.5%
8W–5L · 50.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 66% of the time
#1 Doubles
66%
272 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
92 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
44 matches
#1 Singles
1%
3 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova