← Search

Ligia Bottinelli

— year-end
64 matches · 48W–16L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Ligia Bottinelli to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history64 matches
W
2026-04-26 · #3 Doubles · with Angela Tuckerman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-04-25 · #2 Doubles · with Jamie Roedig championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-04-24 · Orange-Dionne · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Anna Svaetichin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-04-17 · Orange-Dionne · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Anna Svaetichin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-02-21 · Orange/Bottinelli · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Denise Tormey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-02-07 · Florida/Tuckerman/55&Over8.0W · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Angela Tuckerman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-02-07 · Orange/Bottinelli · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Katherine Barnard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-01-31 · #3 Doubles · with Christine Alfert championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-01-24 · Orange/Bottinelli · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Claire Fitzgerald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-01-23 · Orange/Bottinelli · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Annabelle Harris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-01-17 · Florida/Tuckerman/55&Over8.0W · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Angela Tuckerman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-01-10 · Florida/Tuckerman/55&Over8.0W · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jamie Roedig
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
Teams19 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
5.0
83.3%
10W–2L · 66% of games
8.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
9.0
64.7%
11W–6L · 58.4% of games
9.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 51% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
25 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
18 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer