← Search

Jami Hawkins

DENVER, CO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
119 matches · 67W–52L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jami Hawkins to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history119 matches
W
2026-08-18 · GCC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Betsy Phillips
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-08-11 · GCC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jolie Pinke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-30 · GCC TEAL · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kate MacK
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-28 · GCC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shannon Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-07-23 · GCC TEAL · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heidi Wolfe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-21 · GCC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jolie Pinke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
N/A
2026-07-02 · GCC TEAL · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-22 · GCC RED · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jolie Pinke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-06-16 · GCC RED · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Betsy Phillips
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-11 · GCC TEAL · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heidi Wolfe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-09 · GCC RED · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jolie Pinke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-4
L
2026-06-04 · GCC TEAL · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Betsy Phillips
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
0.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
57.1%
64W–48L · 53.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 52% of the time
#1 Doubles
52%
62 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
42 matches
#3 Doubles
8%
10 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches
#1 Female Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova