← Search

Jaylyn Bunning

Denver, CO
4.0A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
180 matches · 83W–97L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jaylyn Bunning to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history180 matches
L
2026-08-18 · CACM RED · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rita Urness
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-08-11 · CACM RED · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Diana Rael
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-04 · CACM RED · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Liza Butterfield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-28 · CACM RED · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-07 · CACM BLUE · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Smita Merchant
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-05 · CACM RED · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ali Barghelame mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-06-30 · CACM BLUE · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Suzi Janzen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-16 · CACM BLUE · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-14 · CACM RED · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nick Schroer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-09 · CACM BLUE · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Casey Thomas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-02 · CACM BLUE · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cynthia Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-05-31 · CACM RED · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Adam Huff mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
48.7%
56W–59L · 50.4% of games
8.0mixed
22.7%
5W–17L · 43.9% of games
8.5mixed
51.7%
15W–14L · 48.3% of games
9.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 29% of the time
#2 Doubles
29%
52 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
49 matches
#1 Singles
18%
33 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
31 matches
#2 Singles
8%
15 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams