Angela Hanson
Chicago, IL
257 matches · 121W–136L · seasons 2019–2027
Captains: add Angela Hanson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history257 matches
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 0-5, 1-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 0-6, 0-1
W
Nancy Hirsch / Yarina Birnbaum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-4
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-4
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-5
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams89 teams · 2021–2027
CHI E 18W4.0 7.ACN Bergman Sun 5 $24
CHI E 40W4.0 8.Tam Corey Sun 11 $25
CHI E 55W8.0 7.STP ODonnell Sun 10 $22
NITA E 40W40d TAM-Lobo Corey
NITA E 80W55c TAM-Lobo-Corey/Cushing
CDTA E 40&OW4.0 2Tam Corey Sun 11 $22
CDTA S 40&OW4.0 4.Tam Corey Sun 11 $22
CDTA S 55&OW8.0 5.STP ODonnell Thu 7 $22
CDTA S ComboW7.5 2.Tam Corey Fri 7 $22
CDTA S ComboW8.5 2.Wilm Thompson Sun 11 $22
CDTA W 40&OW4.0 4.Tam Corey Sun 11 $22
CDTA W 55&OW8.0 8.STP ODonnell Sun 10 $22
CDTA W ComboW7.5 2.Tam Corey Fri 7:30 $22
CDTA W ComboW8.5 1.Wlmt Thompson Sun 11 $22
NITA E 40W40h Glenbrook-Corey/Varcheva
NITA E 80W55c TAM-Corey
NITA S 40W40g TAM-Lobo-Corey
NITA S 80W55b TAM-Lobo-Corey
NITA W 40W40f Glenbrook-Corey/Varcheva
NITA W 80W55c TAM-Lobo Corey
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.0
50%
2W–2L · 48.1% of games
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
55.6%
65W–52L · 51.8% of games
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
52.8%
19W–17L · 52.3% of games
8.0
38.6%
27W–43L · 46.5% of games
8.5
23.8%
5W–16L · 40.1% of games
6.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 46.2% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #3 Doubles, 45% of the time
#3 Doubles
45%
115 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
90 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
52 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
Champions keep playing until they get it right.