Stephanie Thompson
Chicago, IL
300 matches · 146W–154L · seasons 2019–2026
Captains: add Stephanie Thompson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history300 matches
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
N/A
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
N/A
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
W
N/A
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams81 teams · 2021–2027
CHI E 18W4.0 7.ACN Bergman Sun 5 $24
CHI E 40W4.0 8.Tam Corey Sun 11 $25
CDTA E 18&OW4.0 4Nielsen Bergman Sun 5 $22
CDTA E 40&OW4.0 2Tam Corey Sun 11 $22
CDTA S 40&OW4.0 4.Tam Corey Sun 11 $22
CDTA S ComboW7.5 2.Tam Corey Fri 7 $22
CDTA S ComboW8.5 2.Wilm Thompson Sun 11 $22
CDTA W 18&OW4.0 9.Nielsen Bergman Sun 5 $22
CDTA W 40&OW4.0 4.Tam Corey Sun 11 $22
CDTA W 40&OW4.5 4.Wlmt Burns Sat 5 $20
CDTA W ComboW7.5 2.Tam Corey Fri 7:30 $22
CDTA W ComboW8.5 1.Wlmt Thompson Sun 11 $22
CHI F CW8.5 3.Wilm Thompson Sun 11 $22
NITA E 40W40h Glenbrook-Corey/Varcheva
NITA S 40W40g TAM-Lobo-Corey
NITA W 40W40f Glenbrook-Corey/Varcheva
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
4.0
56.8%
92W–70L · 54.2% of games
4.5
40.5%
17W–25L · 47.6% of games
5.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
35.7%
5W–9L · 49.4% of games
8.5
43.2%
16W–21L · 46.3% of games
10.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
50%
3W–3L · 45.5% of games
8.0mixed
30%
6W–14L · 46.2% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #2 Doubles, 33% of the time
#2 Doubles
33%
98 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
81 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
75 matches
#1 Singles
14%
41 matches
#2 Singles
1%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.