← Search

Gillian Dionne

Indialantic, FL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
171 matches · 96W–75L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Gillian Dionne to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history171 matches
W
2026-09-12 · Desoto - Simmons · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Anne Ramsey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-09 · Desoto - Simmons · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Claudia Berk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-07-27 · EFSC - Simmons · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jessica Vega Coots
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-09 · Desoto - Simmons · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jessica Shinn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 0-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-14 · Desoto - Simmons · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Schleicher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-05-28 · Desoto - Simmons · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jessica Vega Coots
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-03-21 · Fee - Simmons · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Claudia Berk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
N/A
2026-02-20 · Kiwanis - Baggett · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Terry Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-02-06 · Kiwanis - Baggett · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Anna Butler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-01-31 · Fee - Simmons · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-01-24 · Fee - Simmons · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Thessen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-01-10 · Fee - Simmons · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Beth Wolfram
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
62.5%
50W–30L · 55.6% of games
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
55.6%
15W–12L · 52.6% of games
8.0
25%
3W–9L · 47.9% of games
8.0mixed
60.5%
23W–15L · 55% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 53% of the time
#1 Doubles
53%
90 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
40 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
32 matches
#1 Singles
4%
6 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer