← Search

Kathryn Hawkins

— year-end
241 matches · 156W–85L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Kathryn Hawkins to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history241 matches
L
2026-07-24 · Indy X18 9.0 BRE Keele · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Steven Pjevach mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-15 · Indy A40 4.5W LCHS Hawkins · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kristi McGrady
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-07-10 · Indy X18 9.0 BRE Keele · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jackson Barrett mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-07-08 · Indy A40 4.5W LCHS Hawkins · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tara Schetzel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-01 · Indy A40 4.5W LCHS Hawkins · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tara Schetzel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-06-24 · Indy A40 4.5W LCHS Hawkins · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Michelle Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-3
W
Mimi Murphy / Sunny Taylor
2026-06-22 · Indy A18 4.5W LCHS Hawkins · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Amy Schmidt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-06-12 · Indy X18 9.0 BRE Keele · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Steven Pjevach mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-10 · Indy A40 4.5W LCHS Hawkins · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Julia Enkema
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-05-27 · Indy A40 4.5W LCHS Hawkins · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kate Dieveney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-4
W
2026-05-20 · Indy A40 4.5W LCHS Hawkins · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kristi McGrady
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-05-11 · Indy A18 4.5W LCHS Hawkins · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Anne Luke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
Teams17 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.5
71.5%
93W–37L · 59.8% of games
5.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 61.2% of games
8.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 63.4% of games
10.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 57.8% of games
8.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
52.5%
42W–38L · 50% of games
9.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
109 matches
#2 Doubles
38%
92 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
39 matches
#4 Doubles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams