← Search

Emily Gallops

Memphis, TN
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
58 matches · 35W–23L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Emily Gallops to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history58 matches
W
Heather Patterson / Abby G Patterson
2026-08-30 · Echols/ Memphis · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Stacey Hyde
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-16 · Echols/ Memphis · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Veronica Anthony
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
Alison Rice / Courtney Smith
2026-08-09 · Echols/ Memphis · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Andrea Henry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2025-12-14 · Mccalla/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Shelley Richter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2025-11-04 · Mccalla/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Meredith Haselwood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2025-09-30 · Mccalla/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Meredith Haselwood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2025-09-16 · Echols/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Latasha Echols
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2025-08-24 · Echols/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Nelli Golmeeva
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
L
2025-08-17 · Echols/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Lynn Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2025-07-12 · Holley/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Gregory Szatkowski mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-06-28 · Holley/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Gregory Szatkowski mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W
Elizabeth Lewis / Courtney Smith
2025-06-26 · Lockard/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Nelli Golmeeva
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
100%
12W–0L · 74.6% of games
4.5
56.5%
13W–10L · 54.4% of games
8.5
58.3%
7W–5L · 52.6% of games
4.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 52.1% of games
4.5mixed
14.3%
1W–6L · 39.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
28 matches
#1 Singles
19%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
10%
6 matches
#2 Singles
10%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams