← Search

Andrea Henry

Bartlett, TN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
140 matches · 69W–71L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Andrea Henry to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history140 matches
L
2026-08-30 · Hayes/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Donna Kothe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-18 · Martin Tri · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Latasha Echols
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-08-16 · Hayes/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Eva Farris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-16 · Echols/ Memphis · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jennifer Magee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
Emily Koelsch / Margaret Johnson
2026-08-15 · Richards/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brandi Tomlinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
Alison Rice / Courtney Smith
2026-08-09 · Echols/ Memphis · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Emily Gallops
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-02 · Richards/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with BALAJI KRISHNAIAH mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-07-29 · Hollis/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paul Woods mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-28 · Martin Tri · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Holly Bigham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-20 · Flesch/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christine Scifert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-14 · Echols/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Latasha Echols
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
Claire Fowler / Jennifer Wright
2026-07-09 · Flesch/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christine Scifert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams90 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
63%
46W–27L · 53.1% of games
4.5
15%
3W–17L · 33.9% of games
7.5
37.5%
6W–10L · 48% of games
8.5
10%
1W–9L · 33.9% of games
4.0mixed
61.1%
11W–7L · 53.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
62 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
39 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
31 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe