← Search

Debbie Walker-Hulette

Eads, TN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
90 matches · 55W–35L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Debbie Walker-Hulette to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history90 matches
L
2026-09-01 · Dertien/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Mary Ellen Mathews
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-08-30 · Laschober/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Wang-Ying Glasgow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-30 · Dertien/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Mary Ellen Mathews
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
Sarah Hervey / Katie Moore
2026-08-09 · Dertien/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Marla Goodwin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-29 · Hollis/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mark Gagliano mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 5-7
W
2026-07-28 · Dunlap Tri 3.0-4.0 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nancy Goodwin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-21 · Brown/NC/Southaven · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daniel Forbes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-0
L
2026-07-19 · Hayes/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kevin Hayes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-16 · Dunlap Tri 3.0-4.0 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nancy Goodwin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-15 · Hollis/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mark Gagliano mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-13 · Myers/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Hollis-Talley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
Freddy Ojeda / Emily Brown
2026-07-12 · Richards/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeffery Suber mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams70 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
68.9%
31W–14L · 58.9% of games
7.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 55.8% of games
8.5
26.7%
4W–11L · 44.8% of games
4.0mixed
70%
14W–6L · 55% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
34 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
18 matches
#1 Singles
8%
7 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal