← Search

Mark Gagliano

— year-end
30 matches · 26W–4L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Mark Gagliano to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history30 matches
W
2026-08-19 · Bartley/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cade Bishop
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-07-29 · Hollis/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Debbie Walker-Hulette mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 5-7
W
2026-07-15 · Hollis/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Debbie Walker-Hulette mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
Michael McKenna / Alan Kirk
2026-05-07 · Philips/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Steven Philips
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
Diego Hijano / Ariel Lopez
2026-04-25 · Philips/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Will Hudson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-11-05 · Moore/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Bartholomew
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2025-09-24 · Bartley/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Alfredo Ale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2025-09-04 · Bartley/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jonathan Laman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2025-08-29 · Bartley/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Grant Goforth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2025-08-25 · Bartley/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jason Cousar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-04-29 · Cooper/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bret Sokoloff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2025-04-26 · Moore/Memphis · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
Teams40 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
86.7%
13W–2L · 55.5% of games
4.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
100%
7W–0L · 62.3% of games
8.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
5 matches
#1 Singles
3%
1 match
#2 Singles
3%
1 match
#4 Doubles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert