← Search

Jane Gens

Fredonia, NY
4.0S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
58 matches · 36W–22L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jane Gens to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history58 matches
W
2026-07-21 · BUF: Love 716 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Virginia Filiaci
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-07-14 · BUF: Love 716 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Virginia Filiaci
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
2025-04-25 · Wilbon · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Turhan Wilbon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-4
W
2025-04-04 · Wilbon · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Eric Schuman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
W
2025-02-21 · Wilbon · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Eric Schuman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-6
W
N/A
2024-07-06 · Western: Olympus · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Timothy Prise mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2024-07-04 · Western: Olympus · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Paul Hutschenreuter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
W
2024-06-20 · Western: Olympus · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Timothy Prise mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
2024-06-13 · Western: Olympus · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Timothy Prise mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L
2024-05-05 · #1 Doubles · with Jacob Hofmar-Glennon championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2024-05-05 · #1 Doubles · with Jacob Hofmar-Glennon championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
W
2024-04-21 · BUF: What the Fault · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jacob Hofmar-Glennon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
80%
4W–1L · 72.4% of games
4.5
45.8%
11W–13L · 47.3% of games
7.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0
80%
4W–1L · 63.9% of games
7.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
76.5%
13W–4L · 60.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 83% of the time
#1 Doubles
83%
48 matches
#2 Doubles
9%
5 matches
#3 Doubles
7%
4 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams