← Search

David Graham

Berwyn, PA
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
39 matches · 16W–23L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add David Graham to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history39 matches
L
2026-08-14 · Forever Young · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with David Littell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-14 · Forever Young · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Gene Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
Allen Shubin / Daryl Ormont
2026-08-14 · Forever Young · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Gene Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-15 · Forever Young · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Tom Sellig
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-2
L
2025-08-21 · Forever Young · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Chris Clayton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
W
2025-08-16 · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mitchell Reading
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2025-07-21 · Forever Young · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Chris Clayton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
W
2025-07-16 · Forever Young · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Edward Hughes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2025-06-25 · Forever Young · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with James Olson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
L
2025-06-11 · Forever Young · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with James Boettcher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2025-06-04 · Forever Young · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with James Olson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
L
2024-08-15 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Edward Hughes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams3 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.5
50%
10W–10L · 50.8% of games
8.0
50%
2W–2L · 50.6% of games
9.0
23.1%
3W–10L · 40.9% of games
9.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
12 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
10 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer