← Search

Jim Peterson

MELBOURNE, FL
4.5S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
65 matches · 45W–20L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jim Peterson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history65 matches
W
2026-09-10 · Fee - Moore · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Rohan Ramdeholl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-08-20 · Fee - Moore · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Rohan Ramdeholl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-04-30 · Fee - Nair · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Stephen Westmoreland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-04-23 · Fee - Nair · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with James Knepper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
L
2026-04-17 · Fee - Nair · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with James Knepper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-04-03 · Fee Gold of Cortez · #1 Male Doubles · 10.5 · with James Knepper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-02-12 · Fee Gold of Cortez · #1 Male Doubles · 10.5 · with James Knepper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-12 · Fee Gold of Cortez · #1 Male Doubles · 10.5 · with James Knepper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
Casey Coffey / Leonardo DaSilva
2026-01-15 · Fee Gold of Cortez · #1 Male Doubles · 10.5 · with James Knepper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
Jacob Kargauer / Kenneth Moore
2026-01-08 · Fee Gold of Cortez · #1 Male Doubles · 10.5 · with James Knepper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2023-07-27 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ryan Newkirk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
Klaas-Pieter Jimmink / Robert Steere
2023-06-21 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Thomas Gavin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
10.5
20%
1W–4L · 40.7% of games
4.5
73.1%
38W–14L · 58.1% of games
8.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 66% of the time
#1 Doubles
66%
43 matches
#2 Doubles
15%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
6 matches
#1 Male Doubles
8%
5 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova