← Search

Stephen Westmoreland

— year-end
47 matches · 25W–22L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Stephen Westmoreland to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history47 matches
L
2026-05-21 · Fee - Nair · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Nico San Nicolas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-14 · Fee - Nair · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jason Abbott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-30 · Fee - Nair · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jim Peterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-04-23 · Fee - Nair · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Garrett Bell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-17 · Fee - Nair · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kenneth Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
Casey Coffey / Leonardo DaSilva
2026-01-08 · EFSC The Wild Westmorelands · #1 Male Doubles · 10.5 · with Thomas Eskridge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2025-07-24 · EFSC - Addagarla · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Garrett Bell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2025-06-19 · EFSC - Addagarla · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Garrett Bell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-05-22 · Rockledge - Bennett · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Joel Mayer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 0-6, 0-1
L
2025-04-04 · EFSC - Hartnett · #1 Male Doubles · 9.5 · with Nathan Hartnett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2025-02-28 · EFSC - Hartnett · #1 Male Doubles · 9.5 · with Thomas Eskridge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L
2025-02-07 · EFSC - Hartnett · #1 Male Doubles · 9.5 · with Thomas Eskridge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
Teams19 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
10.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
81.8%
9W–2L · 63.5% of games
4.5
10%
1W–9L · 34.8% of games
8.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 59.4% of games
9.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 56.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
20 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
7 matches
#1 Male Doubles
9%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe