← Search

Shirley Yablonski

— year-end
151 matches · 72W–79L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Shirley Yablonski to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history151 matches
W
2026-07-28 · SYRACUSE: Yablonski 55+ 7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Nelligan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-07-26 · SFTC - Wallenstein · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karl Offen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-16 · Nelligan · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Kaye
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-16 · Yablonski 7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cynthia Ciarpelli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-09 · Yablonski 7.0 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lynn Cifonelli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-02 · Yablonski 7.0 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lynn Cifonelli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
Heidi Howard / Karen Snyder
2026-07-01 · Yablonski · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ping Deng
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-24 · Yablonski · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Kaye
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
L
2026-06-14 · SFTC - Wallenstein · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Ng mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-06-11 · Yablonski 7.0 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sally Pearson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-09 · SYRACUSE: Yablonski 55+ 7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Berger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-08 · Nelligan · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andra Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
Teams28 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
48.3%
29W–31L · 49.8% of games
4.0
25%
1W–3L · 41% of games
7.0
55%
33W–27L · 49.8% of games
8.0
100%
6W–0L · 85.7% of games
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
61 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
46 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
43 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams