← Search

Cynthia Vulcano

Cazenovia, NY
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
43 matches · 28W–15L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Cynthia Vulcano to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history43 matches
W
2026-06-09 · Radoff · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gwenn Judge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-13 · Radoff · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sharon Gerber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-12 · Radoff · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gwenn Judge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-05-06 · Radoff · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sonia Dibiase
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-07-16 · Radoff · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Radoff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W
Jenny Barnett / Heather Harrick
2025-06-04 · Radoff · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sharon Gerber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2025-05-14 · Radoff · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sharon Gerber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2024-07-17 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Radoff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2024-05-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sharon Gerber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2023-05-22 · Radoff · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mindy Turner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2023-05-15 · Radoff · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2023-05-08 · Radoff · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sharon Gerber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
63.9%
23W–13L · 51.9% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
100%
4W–0L · 59.8% of games
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 51% of the time
#1 Doubles
51%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
40%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
5%
2 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal