← Search

Veronica Fox

COLLEGEVILLE, PA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
335 matches · 162W–173L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Veronica Fox to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history335 matches
L
Laurie Black / Jill O'Neill
2026-08-15 · #3 Doubles · with Sandra Parcells championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-06 · 55 and Foxy · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Anne Riley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-08-04 · 55 and Foxy · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Anne Riley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-07-25 · #1 Doubles · with Lesley Oakes championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-21 · Locked and Loaded · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ada Martini
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-19 · #1 Doubles · with Lesley Oakes championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-07-18 · #2 Doubles · with Diana Almada championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
W
Susan Loraine / Laura Walsh
2026-07-12 · What's Up · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melanie Himsworth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-07 · Locked and Loaded · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jill O'Neill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-06-30 · Loch'd and Loaded · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lesley Oakes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-06-29 · Loch'd and Loaded · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lesley Oakes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-06-26 · What's Up · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lesley Oakes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
88.9%
8W–1L · 60.2% of games
4.0
52.7%
108W–97L · 51.5% of games
4.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
47.6%
10W–11L · 51.9% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
49%
24W–25L · 50.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
131 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
102 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
89 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
9 matches
#1 Female Doubles
1%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer