← Search

Kim Clearkin

Claymont, DE
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
215 matches · 117W–98L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Kim Clearkin to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history215 matches
L
2026-09-01 · Notorious K.I.M. · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dinali Jayanetti
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-3
W
2026-08-06 · Mid-Court Crisis · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Maria Zecca
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-0
L
2026-08-04 · Senior Smash · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Patti Berk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-14 · Notorious K.I.M. · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Judy Grasso
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-07 · Slicing Shots · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nan Barash
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-06 · Notorious 40 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-27 · Notorious 40 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jannie Lau
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-06-22 · Notorious 40 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emma Collina
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
Yvonne Schappell / Jill O'Neill
2026-06-15 · Senior Smash · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jill Querey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-07 · Notorious K.I.M. · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maureen Patane
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-06 · Notorious 40 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marcia Keld
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
L
2026-06-03 · Notorious K.I.M. · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maureen Patane
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
81.6%
40W–9L · 64.2% of games
4.0
42.6%
23W–31L · 48.6% of games
7.0
66.7%
8W–4L · 60.1% of games
8.0
25%
5W–15L · 42.9% of games
7.0mixed
62.5%
20W–12L · 54.6% of games
8.0mixed
33.3%
9W–18L · 45.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
90 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
57 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
40 matches
#1 Singles
9%
19 matches
#2 Singles
4%
8 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova