← Search

Christy Leslie

PLEASANT HILL, MO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
142 matches · 62W–80L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Christy Leslie to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history142 matches
L
2026-09-13 · Valdez, Kelli · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lara Maple
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-15 · Valdez, Kelli · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-5
L
2026-05-18 · Valdez, Kelli · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lara Maple
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-05-11 · Valdez, Kelli · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lara Maple
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-04-20 · Valdez, Kelli · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-4
W
2026-03-15 · Valdez, Kelli · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lara Maple
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-03-08 · Valdez, Kelli · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lara Maple
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-3, 1-0
W
2026-03-01 · Valdez, Kelli · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lara Maple
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-4
L
2026-02-08 · Valdez, Kelli · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lara Maple
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-01-11 · Valdez, Kelli · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lara Maple
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2025-12-21 · Bruner, Katherine · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Zingg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2025-11-16 · Bruner, Katherine · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tiffany Hellen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
30.8%
4W–9L · 33.3% of games
4.0
69.8%
37W–16L · 56.7% of games
4.5
21.9%
14W–50L · 35.9% of games
8.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 52.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
56 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
44 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
35 matches
#1 Singles
3%
4 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert