← Search

Jill Heese

Akron, OH
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
75 matches · 33W–42L · seasons 2019–2025

Captains: add Jill Heese to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history75 matches
L
2025-07-09 · A40 3.5W PCC Innes · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carrie Clark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2025-07-08 · A40 3.0W PCC Innes · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erica Gerstenmaier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2025-06-17 · A40 3.0W PCC Innes · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Akhtar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2025-06-04 · A40 3.5W PCC Innes · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Danielle Kimmell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-06-03 · A40 3.0W PCC Innes · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Danielle Kimmell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2025-05-27 · A40 3.0W PCC Innes · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Danielle Kimmell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2025-05-13 · A40 3.0W PCC Innes · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Danielle Kimmell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2024-11-01 · X55 7.0 TP Fox · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Scott Altman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
L
William Scott / Janet Ellen Elder
2024-10-19 · X65 7.0 TP Fox · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Scott Altman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
L
2024-09-22 · X55 7.0 TP Fox · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Edward Raffel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
W
2024-07-17 · A40 3.0W PCC Innes · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Akhtar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2024-07-13 · A18 3.0W PCC Innes · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Danielle Kimmell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
44.7%
17W–21L · 49.1% of games
3.5
23.5%
4W–13L · 41.3% of games
6.0
20%
1W–4L · 50.5% of games
7.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
100%
9W–0L · 71.2% of games
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
16 matches
#4 Doubles
8%
6 matches
#2 Singles
4%
3 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova