← Search

Suzanne Sbrocco

— year-end
57 matches · 30W–27L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Suzanne Sbrocco to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history57 matches
L
2026-03-07 · Low Tri W CC Butler · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Erin Hubbard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-07-24 · A40 4.0W 1 CC2 Sobecks · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Claudia Oates
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-07-17 · A40 4.0W 1 CC2 Sobecks · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Barbara Neilsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2025-07-09 · NEO/Butler/A40/3.5W · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Goetz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2025-07-02 · NEO/Butler/A40/3.5W · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Freund
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
L
2025-06-25 · NEO/Butler/A40/3.5W · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Darcie Hansen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2025-06-19 · A40 4.0W 1 CC2 Sobecks · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Barbara Neilsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2025-06-18 · NEO/Butler/A40/3.5W · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Victoria Kuczynski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2025-05-28 · NEO/Butler/A40/3.5W · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Victoria Kuczynski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-7, 1-0
L
2025-05-15 · A40 4.0W 1 CC2 Sobecks · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Darcie Hansen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2025-04-26 · A18 3.5W CC1 Butler · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Danielle Simpson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
W
2025-04-10 · A55 7.0W CC Marotta · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Natalie Marotta
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
Teams17 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
66.7%
18W–9L · 53.3% of games
4.0
26.7%
4W–11L · 37.2% of games
7.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
66.7%
6W–3L · 52.5% of games
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 32% of the time
#3 Doubles
32%
18 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
15 matches
#4 Doubles
16%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe