← Search

Beth Capelin

New York, NY
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
139 matches · 67W–72L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Beth Capelin to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history139 matches
L
2026-07-28 · Bliss · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Karen Hyams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-14 · Bliss · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Karen Hyams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-04-16 · Eichenbaum/Bliss · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-09 · Eichenbaum/Bliss · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Hyams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-25 · MTDZ: Match Makers · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tempe Zucker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-08 · Eichenbaum/Bliss · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Hyams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-2
W
2026-03-06 · MTDZ: Match Makers · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Dawson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-02-25 · Eichenbaum/Bliss · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maiko Akiba
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-01-16 · MTDZ: Match Makers · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tempe Zucker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L
2025-11-13 · MTDZ: Match Makers · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Yumi Nagahama
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2025-10-24 · MTDZ: Match Makers · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chizu Mendoza
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L
2025-08-26 · Bliss · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Karen Hyams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams42 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
85.7%
6W–1L · 56.8% of games
3.5
14.3%
1W–6L · 38.2% of games
4.0
47.6%
40W–44L · 50.7% of games
4.5
27.3%
3W–8L · 38.7% of games
8.0
53.8%
7W–6L · 52.4% of games
8.0mixed
58.8%
10W–7L · 48.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
50 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
31 matches
#1 Singles
22%
30 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
26 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert