← Search

Meredith Moore

— year-end
119 matches · 80W–39L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Meredith Moore to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history119 matches
W
2026-08-19 · CHIP-Sauld 8.5 COMBO MIX · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Michael Bambini mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-08-10 · CHIP-Sauld 8.5 COMBO MIX · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Christopher Peikert mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-08-05 · CHIP-Sauld 8.5 COMBO MIX · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Michael Bambini mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-08-03 · CHIP-Sauld 8.5 COMBO MIX · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Christopher Peikert mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-6
W
Bjoern Goeke / Claire Stechow
2026-07-17 · CHIP-Formicola 18s 9.0X F · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Joseph Formicola mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-07-15 · CHIP-Formicola 18s 4.5 NW F · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kendra Clark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-08 · CHIP-Formicola 18s 4.5 NW F · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-01 · CHIP-Formicola 18s 4.5 NW F · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-06-10 · CHIP-Formicola 18s 4.5 NW F · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kendra Clark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-06-04 · CHIP-Clark 18s 5.0 NW · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Naoko McKelvey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-03 · CHIP-Formicola 18s 4.5 NW F · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-05-27 · CHIP-Formicola 18s 4.5 NW F · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kendra Clark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-0
Teams30 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.5
71.2%
42W–17L · 60.2% of games
5.0
42.1%
8W–11L · 44.7% of games
8.5mixed
100%
4W–0L · 65.8% of games
9.0mixed
58.8%
10W–7L · 50.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
44 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
36 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
18 matches
#1 Singles
10%
12 matches
#2 Singles
6%
7 matches
#3 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King