← Search

Christopher Peikert

Ann Arbor, MI
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
94 matches · 65W–29L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Christopher Peikert to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history94 matches
W
2026-08-11 · RCAA-Tucker 18s 8.0X F · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Leslie Ehrman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-08-10 · CHIP-Sauld 8.5 COMBO MIX · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Meredith Moore mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-08-03 · CHIP-Sauld 8.5 COMBO MIX · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Meredith Moore mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-6
W
Rohan Nair / Brian Miller
2026-07-31 · #1 Doubles · with Eric Shaw championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-28 · RCAA-Tucker 18s 8.0X F · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jean Wang mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
L
James Lang / Steve Jacobson
2026-07-20 · FAC-Roberts 40s 4.5M · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Eric Mitchell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-14 · RCAA-Shaw 18s 4.0M F2 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
Gaston Calderon
2026-07-09 · HV-Brewer 40s 4.0M F1 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-08 · RCAA-Boodakian (doubles on clay) 18s 4.5M F1 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Elliot Blackstone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-30 · RCAA-Shaw 18s 4.0M F2 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eric Shaw
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-06-26 · RCAA-Tucker 18s 8.0X F · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kaylee Tucker mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-06-23 · RCAA-Shaw 18s 4.0M F2 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
79.7%
51W–13L · 61.9% of games
4.5
14.3%
1W–6L · 33.1% of games
8.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 51% of games
8.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 32% of the time
#1 Singles
32%
30 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
28 matches
#2 Doubles
12%
11 matches
#2 Singles
11%
10 matches
#3 Singles
9%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
6%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer