← Search

Alison Kirschenbaum

Birmingham, MI
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
296 matches · 212W–84L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Alison Kirschenbaum to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history296 matches
W
2026-08-19 · FAC-Keranen 9.5 COMBO MIX · #1 Doubles · 9.5 · with Jason Norville mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
W
Nicole Ehme / Kelly Allen
2026-08-16 · #2 Doubles · with Moorea McNalley championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
Katherine Long / Tara Schetzel
2026-08-16 · #1 Doubles · with Moorea McNalley championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-08-15 · #2 Doubles · with Moorea McNalley championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-08-14 · #1 Doubles · with Moorea McNalley championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
Jill Braendle / Rebecca Potluri
2026-08-08 · #2 Doubles · with Moorea McNalley championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-08-07 · #1 Doubles · with Kristen Charlton championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-08-05 · FAC-Keranen 9.5 COMBO MIX · #1 Doubles · 9.5 · with Jason Norville mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-07-28 · FAC-Payne 18s 9.0X F · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with David Kagan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-07-15 · FAC-Keranen 18s 4.5 NW F · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Moorea McNalley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-07-13 · OHCC-Keranen 40s 4.5 NW F · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Trish Keranen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-06 · OHCC-Keranen 40s 4.5 NW F · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kristen Charlton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams42 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
0.0
90%
9W–1L · 70.5% of games
4.0
94.7%
18W–1L · 72.2% of games
4.5
81.2%
91W–21L · 62.3% of games
5.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.5
70.6%
12W–5L · 57.8% of games
9.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
9.5
25%
1W–3L · 51.9% of games
8.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 65.7% of games
9.0mixed
60.7%
34W–22L · 54.1% of games
9.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 50% of the time
#1 Doubles
50%
149 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
105 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
30 matches
#2 Singles
2%
5 matches
#1 Singles
1%
3 matches
#1 Female Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams