← Search

Anna Creissen

Chapel Hill, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
43 matches · 16W–27L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Anna Creissen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history43 matches
W
2026-04-30 · SSummers-CHTC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Meghan Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-04-29 · TOC.Riddick · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Meghan Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-24 · 6 SBrock-CHTC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hana Mastro
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-23 · SSummers-CHTC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hana Mastro
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-04-14 · TOC.Riddick · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shelly Jude
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-11 · TOC.Riddick · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Meghan Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-04-09 · SSummers-CHTC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Meghan Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-07 · TOC.Riddick · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Meghan Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-24 · TOC.Riddick · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shelly Jude
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-03-20 · 6 SBrock-CHTC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gwendolyn Phillips
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Marybeth Evers / Melissa Phillips
2026-03-19 · SSummers-CHTC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sandra Foye
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-03-10 · 6 SBrock-CHTC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sophie Brock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
52.9%
9W–8L · 52.6% of games
4.0
22.7%
5W–17L · 38.3% of games
7.5
50%
2W–2L · 55.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal