← Search

Sandra Foye

Pittsboro, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
116 matches · 38W–78L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Sandra Foye to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history116 matches
W
2026-09-11 · DCorey-CHTC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sara Summers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-08-31 · HBlankenship-CHTC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Araya Coffey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-08-28 · DCorey-CHTC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sara Summers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-24 · HBlankenship-CHTC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Brenda Pratt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-08-04 · SBrock.7.5C-CHTC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Elizabeth Keating
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-03 · HBlankenship-CHTC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Araya Coffey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
W
2026-04-16 · SSummers-CHTC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sophie Brock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-12 · TOC.Spinarski · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Strong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-04-11 · 6 SBrock-CHTC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tammy Bradley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-09 · SSummers-CHTC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sophie Brock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-29 · TOC.Spinarski · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cheryl Stevens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-03-27 · 6 SBrock-CHTC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tricia Dziabis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
66.7%
22W–11L · 56% of games
4.0
5%
2W–38L · 33.7% of games
6.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 51.8% of games
7.5
31.2%
10W–22L · 42.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 29% of the time
#1 Doubles
29%
34 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
33 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
30 matches
#1 Singles
10%
11 matches
#2 Singles
7%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert